Skip to main content

This blog post was published under the 2015-2024 Conservative Administration

Improving the quality of the financial information on our register

Research has shown that our financial information is the most valuable data set that we hold. The information is used by:

  • businesses
  • financial institutions
  • civil society groups
  • academics
  • journalists
  • the public at large

It supports investment, enables business transactions and helps to hold directors to account.

Accuracy of information is therefore vital.

However, the registrar does not currently have the power to query the information we receive before placing it on the register. Incorrect information is a common cause of complaint.

Another government consultation is seeking to address this issue by strengthening the powers of the registrar. This includes giving a discretionary power to query and check information before it’s placed on the register.

While the vast majority of companies file correctly, we see cases of false information being filed - often by accident but sometimes deliberately. For example, we know some companies file micro-entity accounts when they are not eligible, and law enforcement bodies have highlighted that this practice is commonly used in money laundering cases as a way to hide information.

We want the register to inspire trust and confidence. By improving the quality and integrity of the financial information on the register, we can really make a difference and help drive confidence in the UK economy.

The corporate transparency and register reform consultation, published in 2019, sowed the seeds for significant reform to the role of Companies House to improve business transactions and tackle economic crime.

In this consultation we asked how the financial information on the register could be improved. Respondents challenged us to be more bold and ambitious in our proposals and suggested a wide range of improvements that could be made to improve the quality, timeliness and value of the financial information.

The package of proposals in this consultation largely reflect those suggestions and take account of evidence that we've gathered through our work and engagement with other government departments and agencies.

Balancing the need to tackle fraud and improve quality against the need to not add burdens on companies, is challenging - especially in these difficult times. We've been talking to stakeholders throughout the development of the proposals and this consultation gives wider audiences the opportunity to give their views.

Improving the quality and value of financial information on the UK companies register consultation

The consultation is split into 3 parts:

Part A – How accounts are delivered to Companies House

The first part of the consultation focuses on how accounts are delivered to Companies House and includes proposals to:

  • progress towards filing once with government
  • require accounts to be delivered digitally and to be fully tagged using iXBRL
  • reduce timescales for accounts to be filed

Part B – What information should be filed at Companies House

This part of the consultation outlines the information that is currently required by Companies House and asks whether further information might improve the value of the register. It includes proposals to:

  • require company directors to confirm the company’s eligibility to file the specific type of accounts being used
  • review small company accounts filing options

Part C – What Companies House does with this information

The final part of the consultation explores what Companies House should do with information it receives in accounts. It sets out proposals to:

  • increase the checking of accounts
  • improve the way financial information is displayed on the register

The proposals will give Companies House a more effective role in assisting the government’s wider efforts to tackle economic crime - by improving the quality of the financial information available about companies and other business entities and ensuring that it’s up to date.

Respond to the improving the quality and value of financial information on the UK companies register consultation.

The consultation closes on 3 February and we look forward to hearing your view.

Sharing and comments

Share this page


  1. Comment by David Silver posted on

    I would still like the option to file accounts on paper. I file digitally to HMRC in March each year and with paper to Companies House in the previous November. On a couple of occasions credit checking firms have found an error in my paper accounts and I have put the error right. I am a very small company and can't afford an accountant to do the work for me. it would be a disproportionate cost so I am glad there are people sniffing out errors. When it happened on those occasions Companies House was very good and helpful. If one could file accounts digitally but separately from HMRC that would be good. At the moment my software will file to both but at the same time and as Companies House wants the filing to be done by end of year and HMRC by the end of my tax year I would have to file both before the end of the year. If you allowed a company to file digitally at different times then my software would get updated by the software company - it's cheap and again some of the software is so expensive that it is a disproportionate cost. Of course if Companies House supplied the software that would be great.

    • Replies to David Silver>

      Comment by Ellis Davies - Digital Content Designer posted on

      Hi David, thank you for your comment.

      The consultation is inviting views on the filing options available to small companies with the aim of achieving a better balance between minimising burdens and ensuring the information provided is valuable.

      Please have your say and make sure your opinion is included by responding to the consultation.